Similar to Healthcare – We don’t Have a Plan; But We’ll Block Any Plan You Have For Jobs Mr. President
Bobblehead S. E. Cupp, on CNN’s Crossfire this week, had Former Labor Secretary, (under President Clinton,) Robert Reich (who helped create a net 22 million job increase) and Governor Tim Pawlenty. and what she had was Republican talking points, typical of right-wing media and talking heads. She kept spewing prepared Republican/Teapublican talking points, not listening, or even hearing what her guests were saying. What is the Republican’s plan for creating jobs? They don’t know, but they know their willing to obstruct any ideas the President has, sound familiar? What’s their plan for healthcare for 40 million Americans that didn’t have it, and/or couldn’t afford it? OH! That’s right, they don’t have one, but they spent taxpayer money to the tune of over $60M voting 48 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Here’s just a snippet from the conversation on CNN’s Crossfire where Governor Pawlenty says what he thinks business is saying, and what Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich said to set him straight:
PAWLENTY: “Guess what? There’s a consistent answer from those folks about what they want. And they basically say to government, do things to encourage me, not discourage me. Make the load lighter, not heavier. And that includes things like taxation, like energy policy, like health-care policy and more. But they’re basically saying don’t do things to make my life more difficult, more expensive, more bureaucratic, more inefficient.”
CUTTER: “Well, Governor…”
REICH: “Actually, it’s…”
CUTTER: “Go ahead.”
REICH: “Stephanie, I’m sorry to interrupt you, but I just want to say that — that I’m very proud to be part of an administration that presided over the creation of 22 million net new jobs. That was the Clinton administration.”
See the interview from CNN’s Crossfire Here
Original meme by http://www.Facebook.com/StoptheObstructionistTeaParty and http://www.Medic3569.blogspot.com |
What Does Raising the Minimum Wage Do? Help or Hurt Job Creation?
“And a lot of employers will benefit from a higher minimum wage. We know empirical studies show that. This is not a matter of government planning. This is a matter of doing what we have done in this country — in fact, if we had a minimum wage today that was as high as it was in 1968, adjusted for inflation, it would be $10.40 an hour. And if you add in productivity improvements, minimum wage actually would be $15 an hour.”
A large swath of economists agree, raising the minimum wage is a good idea.
In a letter released Tuesday, January 14, 2014 through the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, 75 economists, including seven Nobel Laureates, argue that the government should hike the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour by 2016 and then peg future increases to inflation. A proposal from Senate Democrats, backed by President Obama, to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour is currently stalled in Congress. Read More from The Huffington Post. Economist Joseph Stiglitz and Larry Summers, argue that the “weight” of the evidence indicates past minimum wage hikes haven’t hurt the job market.
“Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front.”
Original meme by http://www.Facebook.com/StoptheObstructionistTeaParty and http://www.Medic3569.blogspot.com |
Republicans Say President Holding Up “All There Jobs Bills”
The problem with that statement is that they don’t have ANY jobs bills. So how do they get around that? Call every bill a “Jobs Bill.” On Speaker John Boehner’s Blog page he says that the White House is “pivoting” back to jobs and the House doesn’t have to pivot because they have always been about jobs. He offers a list of “Jobs Bills,” the problem? He lists numerous bills, but in the description of the bills offers misleading or straight out false information. He lists bills that favor the oil & gas industry by more deregulation (remember, after 300,000 people in West Virginia had their drinking water contaminated by a Koch Brothers affiliated chemical company he said “there are plenty of regulations in effect.”) and bills that help the ultra-rich with more tax relief, etc., but none of the bills actually create a significant number of jobs. Check the Speaker’s page and then check the actual bills at www.GovTrack.us.
Photo by legalinsurrection.com |
What the Republicans “Say” and “Do” are Different, as Usual
Republicans came out this year saying they have a “Jobs Agenda,” and it’s not just the same old “cut taxes to the rich job creators” and “remove all those pesky regulations that tie the hands of industry.”
Nationwide, many our lifeline systems are approaching a different kind of catastrophe. One trillion dollars is the price tag on the U.S. infrastructure deficit, an issue President Obama knows well.
“We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy,” Obama said.
Quietly and consistently, infrastructure is emerging as one of the three key elements of Obama’s clarion call to returning to the domestic agenda.
Second only to jobs—above even energy—infrastructure, that critical and unsexy topic has come to the fore of the president’s mind and message.
Back in June, 2011 The U.S. Conference of Mayors, put forward a resolution to Congress that the $126 billion dollars going annually to pay for America’s wars abroad be spent at home instead.
The mayors set an agenda that mirrored the presidents: jobs, sustainable energy, and rebuilding America—roads, dams, water and sewer systems, among others.
“That we would build bridges in Baghdad and Kandahar and not Baltimore and Kansas City, absolutely boggles the mind,” L.A.’s flamboyant and outspoken Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said. Read More from The Daily Beast June 23, 2011 article.
Michael Tomasky in an article The GOP’s “Jobs” Hypocrisy for The Daily Beast on January 3, 2014 writes about a piece by Michael R. Strain of National Affairs “A Jobs Agenda for the Right” whereas Michael makes some suggestions to the Republicans. It includes, ready? wait for it, INFRASTRUCTURE! Where did we hear that before? One particular part of Michael’s work is this:
Back to Michael Tomasky “UM, O.K. There are people who’ve been trying to do just that. And not only Barack Obama. John Kerry led this effort in the Senate, and he was joined by Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison (who’s since retired). Their attempts to fund a modest infrastructure bank were supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. But it could never get anywhere because of rock-solid GOP opposition. Does Strain not even know this? Or is he pretending it never existed so he doesn’t have to deal with the political reality of Republican obduracy?
I think, of course, it’s the latter, and there’s further evidence for my guess in the way Strain talks about recent history. The 2009 stimulus was not a failure in infrastructure terms at all (has he read Michael Grunwald?). But even if you believe it was an infrastructure failure, or have to say so for political reasons, should you not acknowledge in fairness that it was Democrats and liberals who wanted it to have more infrastructure spending, and that nearly 40 percent of bill took the form of tax cuts because that’s what Republicans demanded (before they decided en masse to vote against it anyway)?”
Meme by waliberals.org |
President Obama’s Proposed Jobs Bills
Photo by www.whitehouse.gov |