Government Shut Down

Let’s Hope America Can Start Moving Forward and Stop The Nonsense

Cartoon by web.media.mit.edu

Government Open, Debt Ceiling Lifted, Can We Move On To the Many Things That Have Been Neglected Now?

The fact that we got to this point, and how we got here, is not only embarrassing for the country, but it hurt the country in many ways, and very deeply. The economy lost a great deal. On October 1st Bloomberg News stated “A partial shutdown of the federal government will cost the U.S. at least $300 million a day in lost economic output at the start, according to IHS Inc. In sixteen days that would be $4.8 Billion, but it’s actually worse than that because it lasted so long. I guess we need to be grateful the end of the shutdown and the threat of default is behind us but it doesn’t feel like a time to celebrate. There are many families that have lost and will not be able to make back what was lost during this shutdown. Although the Federal workers may be paid for their time off, all the people, and businesses, that service them, and depend on income from tourists around our National Parks will never see the income they lost come back. For now, I guess we just have to be grateful it’s over.
Graphic by www.jpayplans.com

 Time to Start Rebuilding, Dealing With All The Other Issues That Were Neglected During the Obstructions

First we need to fix the enrollment computer problems for the Affordable Care Act. We have so many things that need tending it’s hard to think of what to do next; Jobs (maybe an infrastructure bill,) Immigration, Economy, Voting Rights, Equality, Climate, etc., etc.. The Congressmen/women and Senators must find a way to work together in the best interest of the people of this great country. The obstructionism and hatred has hurt this country but we shall overcome it. Perhaps we can at least start talking about some of these issues before the next round of talks about continuing resolutions and debt ceilings start again in January and February. There are many things in the works that need to be addressed like voter suppression laws in over 30 states, Women’s Rights that are being attacked, and the corruption of our politicians and elections that Citizen’s United has blown wide open. We’ll have to hope that the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t make it ten times worse with McCutcheon v FEC. But “what can I do?” you might ask. You can gather facts from numerous sources, that’s important, and then contact your Congressmen/women and Senators.

Now is an Opportune Time to Contact YOUR Representatives to tell Them How YOU Feel about the Issues that We face

Graphic by capwiz.com

 Get the Facts First!

With news cycles being almost non-existent as far as how long a news cycle actually last with cable news and the internet it is more important than ever to make sure that you rely on more than one source, and the credibility  of those sources. I think it is extremely important to listen to different sources on any issue to know I’m hearing both sides, although at times I almost get sick to my stomach and wonder why it’s legal for our own politicians to knowingly go on TV or radio and lie, knowing damn well that they are lying. Once your sure you’ve formed an opinion from gathering facts from numerous sources e-mail, or call, your Congressmen/women, ans Senators (2) to tell them what YOU think would be better for yourself and the country. History shows that when the American people get involved and contact their representatives your voice gets louder and louder. You can make a difference. Finally, take the time to engage in conversation with your neighbors, your co-workers, your fellow Americans and have discussions on why you think a certain way. We obviously need to talk to the people who are representing us in the government, because right now all they hear is from the big money influences that only care about themselves having everything their way. The richest Americans have done extremely well since they took all the 401k’s, people’s equity in their homes (if they were able to keep their home at all,) basically their net worth. Middle class Americans have had stagnant wages and no growth because the 1% has all the money and the power because they control our lawmakers.
Use this link to find your Congressmen/women and how to call or e-mail them:
Use this link to find your Two (2) Senators and how to call or e-mail them:

Let’s Get Our Country Back to The Beautiful Country That It Is

Photo by walkerreort.blogspot.com

Only 14 States, and Washington D. C Have Set Up Their Own Affordable Healthcare (Obamacare) Marketplace Exchanges

 Tell YOUR Congress and Senate to Obey the Law That They Swore an Oath to Uphold

Actual Pros and Cons of “The Affordable Care Act” aka “Obamacare”

 An article by bloomberg.com spells out some pros and cons of what’s happening with the Affordable Care Act implementation. http://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/health-insurance-exchanges/  The Republicans attaching defunding, delaying, ans obstructing the Affordable Care Act after is was voted into law by the Congress and the Senate, and upheld by the Supreme Court is nothing more than hurting this country immensely. Shutting down the government, and probably risking the full faith and credit of the United States when the debt ceiling comes up on October 17th is wrong. With the health Exchanges opening yesterday the law is being implemented to help the 30 million Americans who couldn’t afford healthcare get it. This is a good for all.

If exchanges work as intended, premiums will fall and more people will obtain insurance. If not, costs could rise, especially for younger customers. A few states started organizing their exchanges early and are predicting success; California said in May that insurers agreed to offer cheaper rates than many had predicted. But the technical hurdles are huge, some states have delayed critical functions and there is much debate over the practical fallout.

Healthcare Costs Have Been Rising at a Much Slower Rate Since The Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) Has Been Law

 Healthcare costs were rising at about 12% a year, with the Affordable Care Act being made law in 2010 costs have risen much slower, about 4% a year. Since healthcare is such a large part of the non-defense expenditures this is good. Yet there is a small, bet very well-backed faction in our Congress that is hell bent on blocking the law from being implemented. There is a tremendous amount of money being spent ti discourage young people from signing up on the exchanges, to get affordable health insurance plans because they know that for the law to work we need young people to sign up.

People Must Learn What The Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare)Does and Does NOT Do

 People need to learn what the Affordable Care Act is all about. It is discouraging when a talk show like Jimmy Kimmel Live asks people about the Affordable Care Act, and Obamacare, and many people are dead set against “Obamacare” but like the benefits of the Affordable Care Act. They are the same exact thing people! When some people are asked if they are for the Affordable Care Act, or, Obamacare many say they are against it, However, when asked about specific things in the law, they are 100% for them. For instance; when asked if young people should be able to stay on their parents health insurance plans, they say YES. When asked if insurance companies should be able to drop subscribers, after the subscribers have been paying premiums for years, just because they get sick, they say NO. When asked if insurance companies should be able to deny insurance to anyone with a pre-existing condition, they NO. When asked if the insurance companies should be forced to spend at least 85% of the money they collect for premiums on actual benefits for the insured, instead of boosting their profits and giving their shareholders bigger dividends, and their executives bigger bonuses, they say YES. Well folks, these are all things that the Affordable Care Act have ALREADY DONE!

To get real facts about “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” the actual name of the law, also known as “Obamacare,” click on this link http://www.obamacarefacts.com/ .

So, what can I do? 

The Congressmen and Senators have listened to the people before when enough pressure through phone calls and e-mails were made directly to their offices. It has become less so since the Tea Party, and the money behind them, have put pressure on all of the politicians by threatening to run primary campaigns against anyone that doesn’t do what they want, as evidence in things like background checks for gun purchases was an issue. Everywhere from 75% to 90% of people in districts told their representatives they were for background checks but the representatives caving to the Tea Party and the NRA voted against what the people wanted. But the people putting pressure on the representatives is still the best way to try to get the Congress and the Senate to do what we want.

Get Involved For A Better America – YOU CAN Make A Difference

 Contact YOUR Congressmen by using this link http://www.house.gov/representatives/ and your Senators by using this link http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm and tell them that you are for 30 million people who can’t afford health insurance getting it, and you are for all of the things mentioned above that the Affordable Care Act has already done. Tell them that you want them to stop worrying about the Tea Party running a primary election against them because YOU will vote them out if they don’t start moving forward. We need jobs, we need the infrastructure improved, we need better education and much more. Tell them to stand up to the big money and do their jobs. Remind them that they took an oath to not only uphold the Constitution of the United States, but to uphold it’s laws, of which “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” aka “Obamacare,” is one of. Make the phone call, send the e-mail, it’s really easy with the links above. It CAN make a difference.

The "Vitter Amendment" Is Total BS

 The “Vitter Amendment” Is Total BS

I’m better known for the hookers thing, but I also have this terrible amendment.
Photo by Mark Wilson, Getty Images

The Best Fiction Writers in the World Couldn’t Make This Stuff Up, But the Republicans Can

  The way the exchanges work in the Affordable Care Act is that the government provides subsidies so that people who don’t currently get employer-provided insurance can afford to buy it. Congressional members and their staff get employer paid health insurance! In fact members of Congress get the best health insurance available in the country. Yet we keep hearing from Tea Party members, like Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaking to Laura Ingraham, a right-wing radio talk show host, who are probably in need of serious psychological treatment, that the Democrats and the President are willing to give members of Congress a special congressional exemption. This, pardon my language, is TOTAL, AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT!

 Let me explain by quoting excepts from an article by Matthew Yglesias of http://www.slate.com, and the actual amendment. First as to the benefits of the Vitter Amendment, there are none. Absolutely NONE!  It all goes back to an amendment to the Affordable Care Act spearheaded by Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa. This was supposed to be a poison-pill measure that would force congressional staff to obtain their health insurance on Affordable Care Act exchanges.

 Grassley thought that the Democrats would reject this idea out of hand. But Democrats genuinely think that health insurance exchanges are a good idea and were happy to sign on to this piece of legislative trolling. Public officials are always concerned about what public services are of benefit to them. That’s why sequestration’s impact on air travel was addressed much more adroitly than its impact on preschool for poor kids.

Wait for it, Wait for it

 But there’s a nuance here. The way most people, including congressional staffers, get health care is that their employer partially pays for it, as in the case of Congressional members and their staffers. The way the exchanges work is that the government provides subsidies so that people who don’t currently get employer-provided insurance can afford to buy it. The Grassley amendment, on one reading, would create an anomalous situation where not only would congressional staff have to buy insurance on the exchanges, they’d be taking a large de facto pay cut. That’s because they’d be losing a valuable perk (employer-provided insurance) and given nothing in exchange for it. That doesn’t really make sense as public policy, and certainly, Grassley’s intention wasn’t to enact an across the board cut in congressional staff pay. He was just trolling. At any rate, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) stepped in and said they did not interpret the Grassley amendment in this way. Instead they read it as authorizing the government to redirect money currently spent on buying health insurance for congressional staff to subsidizing the purchase of insurance on Obamacare exchanges. Thus, congressional staff will participate in the exchanges and the exchange process but won’t end up taking a pay cut. Somehow the conservative press convinced itself that this constituted a “special congressional exemption” from Obamacare or from the individual mandate. At this point David Vitter, whether out of stupidity, (probably out of stupidity) or what, I can’t quite say, says Matthew Yglesias, took up this banner and has been actually sponsoring legislation that would overrule the OPM and force the perverse reading of the Grassley amendment onto the government.

I Warned You, The Best Fiction Writers in the World Couldn’t Make this Stuff Up, But the Republicans Did!

 Bringing the Vitter amendment into the government shutdown fight serves one very important purpose for cynical Republicans. Democrats do not like the Vitter amendment (because it’s dumb), and yet if the government would’ve shut down over a Vitter amendment dispute, that would arguably make the Democrats look bad rather than the Republicans. If GOP leaders can persuade their crazy base that this Vitter amendment fight is important, that would allow the leadership to extricate itself from the untenable situation it’s currently in. That said, the problem for Republicans here is that the Vitter amendment is really dumb. It’s entirely possible that if they pick the fight on these grounds, Democrats will have to cave. At which point congressional Republicans will have succeeded in cutting their staff’s pay and not much else. Not anything else, in fact. The implementation of Obamacare won’t be impacted at all even a tiny little bit.

 This, my followers, is how Republicans create something and then try to turn it around and make the Democrats look bad for something that they created in the first place, and in actuality will never come to fruition. You can’t make this stuff up, but the Republicans can, and do.

 To read Matthews entire article on slate.com click this link. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/09/30/vitter_amendment_is_total_bs.html

The Debt Limit: History and Recent Increases – A Government Shutdown is NOT the Answer

Debt Ceiling Increases by Presidents – Congressional Budget Office – Photo by Thinkprogress.org

The Debt Limit: History and Recent Increases

CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 
This report, of which we are using excerpts was completed  by the Congressional Research Service.
 
In an effort to explain what the Debt Limit (or Ceiling) is, the history of  Debt Ceiling increases, why they are needed, and why they are normally a formality excepts of this report by the Congressional Research Service will be used.  In the chart above, prepared by the Congressional Budget Office, you can see that under President George W. Bush the debt ceiling was raised by 90.2%  for the years 2001-2009. President Obama has increased the debt ceiling  26.3% from 2009 until the present. But before we get to heavily into the numbers we will talk about the history.

Why Have a Debt Limit?

The debt limit can hinder the Treasury’s ability to manage the federal government’s finances. In extreme cases, when the federal debt is very near its statutory limit, the Treasury must take unusual and extraordinary measures to meet federal obligations. While the debt limit has never caused the federal government to default on its obligations, it has at times caused great inconvenience and has added uncertainty to Treasury operations. The debt limit also provides Congress with the strings to control the federal purse, allowing Congress to assert its constitutional prerogatives to control spending. The debt limit also imposes a form of fiscal accountability that compels Congress and the President to take visible action to allow further federal borrowing when the federal government spends more than it collects in revenues. In the words of one author, the debt limit “expresses a national devotion to the idea of thrift and to economical management of the fiscal affairs of the government.” On the other hand, some budget experts have advocated elimination of the debt limit, arguing that other controls provided by the modern congressional budget process established in 1974 have superseded the debt limit, and that the limit does little to alter spending and revenue policies that determine the size of the federal deficit.

A Brief History of the Federal Debt Limit

Origins of the Federal Debt Limit

The statutory limit on federal debt began with the Second Liberty Bond Act of 1917, which helped finance the United States’ entry into World War I. By allowing the Treasury to issue long-term Liberty Bonds, which were marketed to the public at large, the federal government held down its interest costs. Before World War I, Congress authorized specific loans, such as the Panama Canal loan, or allowed the Treasury to issue specific types of debt instruments, such as certificates of indebtedness, bills, notes and bonds. In other cases, Congress provided the Treasury with limited discretion to choose debt instruments. With the passage of the Second Liberty Bond Act, Congress enacted aggregate constraints on certificates of indebtedness and on bonds that allowed the Treasury greater ability to respond to changing conditions and more flexibility in financial management. Debt limit legislation in the following two decades also set separate limits for different categories of debt, such as bills, certificates, and bonds. In 1939, Congress eliminated separate limits on bonds and on other types of debt, which created. This measure gave the Treasury freer rein to manage the federal debt as it saw fit. Thus, the Treasury could issue debt instruments with maturities that would reduce interest costs and minimize financial risks stemming from future. On the other hand, although the Treasury was delegated greater independence of action, the debt limit on the eve of World War II was much closer to total federal debt than it had been at the end of World War I. For example, the 1919 Victory Liberty Bond Act (P.L. 65-328) raised the maximum allowable federal debt to $43 billion, far above the $25.5 By contrast, the debt limit in 1939 was $45 billion, only about 10% above the $40.4 billion total federal debt of that time.

World War II and After

The debt ceiling was raised to accommodate accumulating costs for World War II in each year
from 1941 through 1945, when it was set at $300 billion. After World War II ended, the debt limit was reduced to $275 billion. Because the Korean War was mostly financed by higher taxes rather than by increased debt, the limit remained at $275 billion until 1954. After 1954, the debt limit was reduced twice and increased seven times, until March 1962 when it again reached $300 billion, its level at the end of World War II. Since March 1962, Congress has enacted 74 separate measures that have altered the limit on federal debt. Most of these changes in the debt limit were, measured in percentage terms, small in comparison to changes adopted in wartime or during the Great Depression. Some recent increases in the debt limit,  however, were large in dollar terms. For instance, in May 2003, the debt limit increased by $984 billion. 

 

Summary of the Report

Total debt of the federal government can increase in two ways. First, debt increases when the government sells debt to the public to finance budget deficits and acquire the financial resources needed to meet its obligations. This increases debt held by the public. Second, debt increases when the federal government issues debt to certain government accounts, such as the Social Security, Medicare, and Transportation trust funds, in exchange for their reported surpluses. This increases debt held by government accounts. The sum of
debt held by the public and debt held by government accounts is the total federal debt. Surpluses generally reduce debt held by the public,while deficits raise it. 

 

The Debt Ceiling in the Last Decade

During the four years (FY1998-FY2001) the government ran surpluses, federal debt held by intergovernmental accounts grew by $855 billion and debt held by the public fell by almost $450 billion. Since FY2001, however, debt held by the public has grown due to persistent and substantial budget deficits. Debt held in government accounts also has grown, in large part because Social Security payroll taxes have exceeded payments of beneficiaries. Table 1 shows components of debt in current dollars and as percentages of gross domestic product (GDP).

Table 1. Components of Debt Subject to Limit, FY1996-FY2009

(in billions of current dollars and as percentage of GDP) 

To see the entire report click this link: http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL31967_20100128.pdf
 

Components of Federal Debt As a Percentage of GDP, FY1940-FY2000

Figure 1. Components of Federal Debt As a Percentage of GDP, FY1940-FY2009

The report then explains how debt limit issues from 2002-2007.  The table below shows increases in the debt limit since 2000.

Table 2. Increases in the Debt Limit Since January 2000

Concluding Comments

Since the late 1950s, the federal government increased its borrowing from the public in all years,
except in FY1969 following imposition of a war surcharge and in the period FY1997-FY2001.
The persistence of federal budget deficits has required the government to issue more and more
debt to the public. The accumulation of Social Security and other trust funds, particularly after
1983 when recommendations of the Greenspan Commission were implemented, led to sustained
growth in government-held debt subject to limit. The growth in federal debt held by the public
and in intergovernmental accounts, such as trust funds, has periodically obliged Congress to raise
the debt limit. Between August 1997, when the debt limit was raised to $5,950 billion, and the beginning of
FY2002 in October 2001, federal budget surpluses reduced debt held by the public. From the end
of FY2001, the last fiscal year with a surplus, until the end of FY2008, debt held by the public
subject to limit grew by $2,484 billion. Federal debt held in intergovernmental accounts grew
steadily throughout the period, rising by $1,743 billion since the beginning of FY 2002

The Bottom Line:

Raising the Debt Ceiling Should Not Be a Bargaining Chip and Held Hostage in Lieu of a Government Shutdown

The Republican controlled House of Representatives has now voted on bills to send to the Senate that include delaying the Affordable Care Act for one year, which President Obama has already said he would allow.

Senate Democratic leadership said they will not accept this language, pushing the federal government a step closer to a government shutdown on Oct. 1. The vote was 231-192 with 2 Republicans voting against and 2 Democrats voting for the measure.

Shutting down the government is not the answer, and most Republicans know that this will hurt their party but the extremist Tea Party members have tunnel-vision and simply, don’t care. Contact your Congressmen and Senators and tell them to work it out. Raising the debt ceiling does NOT give authority to spend more money, it only allows America to pay the bills it has already accrued.

To find and contact your Senators use this link: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

To find and contact your Congressmen use this link: http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Do it now. Send an e-mail or make a call. People can get things done when they come together and make contact with their representatives.

Did Brit Hume Really Ask This Question?

 Did Brit Hume Really Ask This Question?

They believe in govt. Hate interruptions. MT“@AdamBaldwin: If a government shutdown harms the GOP, then why would Democrats be against it?”

 

Someone please tell him that maybe it’s because we don’t want the country to experience all the negative things that occur when the United States Government is shut down. REALLY?! I think he needs a vacation. For real, or at least some psychological treatment.

54-44 The Senate Vote to Fund the Government with the Provision to Defund Obamacare Removed

 54-44 The Senate Vote to Fund the Government with the Provision to Defund Obamacare Removed

Recap of Events in the House and Senate the Last Few Days

Let’s recap the last couple days; The House of Representatives passed a CR bill that defunded Obamacare and sent it to the Senate.

Senator Cruz made a deal with Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid to speak on the Senate floor on Wednesday, he started at 2:41pm EST and spoke for 21 hours. The speech was not really a filibuster because it was never going to stop a vote on cloture, to allow discussion of the bill passed by the house. It was touted as a fauxlibuster because it was never going to stop the vote for cloture, it was a fake filibuster. Mind you the supposed fauxlibuster was to stop a bill put forth by the Republicans in the house. 

Near the end of his little show Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) he said “A vote for cloture is a vote for Obamacare.” That’s right, Senator Cruz said a vote for cloture (a vote to allow discussion of the bill ) is a vote for Obamacare. So, since his speech wasn’t really a filibuster the vote on cloture took place, wait for it, wait for it, it passed 100-0! Senator Cruz voted for it, therefore voting for Obamacare. You can’t make this stuff up. The Republican party is so broken that no one knows how to fix it. How are we supposed to fix anything else?

The Senate held four votes today that ultimately, sent a bill back to the Congress, restoring funding for Obamacare, and hopefully addressed some of the spending issues that House Speaker John Boehner proposed where 100% of the defense cuts were removed giving the defense spending an actual increase and keeping in place the cuts to non-defense cuts through sequestration. In hopes of passing what is being called “clean bill” continuing resolution (CR) the bill is now back in the house. That leaves only leaves until Monday night at midnight for the Congress to act before a government shut down will take place.

Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT) have been attacking House Republicans for not passing a  a bill to defund Obamacare. After his 21-hour speech to raise money and gain even more popularity with the obstructionist Tea Party under the premise of a filibuster, which wasn’t really a filibuster, Senator Cruz said “A vote for cloture is a vote for Obamacare.” The result of that Senate vote was 100-0, meaning that he himself voted for cloture! Wait, What?! Still have trouble with that.

Today the Senate voted 54-44 to pass a continuing resolution to fund the government with the provision to defund Obamacare removed.. So, now it’s back in the hands of the House of Representatives. We need everyone to CONTACT their Congressmen and tell them we do not want a government shutdown. It is the mission of this blog to motivate people to actually contact their representatives to put pressure on them to do the right thing. We try to do this by making it easier to do that. So, here is a link that you can use to identify who your Congressmen are and how to contact them.

http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Please get involved and take a moment to call, or send an e-mail to your Congressman or woman right now.